THE VELLATTANJUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3906, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)A
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide the appeal (Ext.P3) within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The decision is to be taken in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Crucially, the Court directed that the recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance until a decision is taken on the appeal. The Court also specified that the Commissioner should not insist on the payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per a circular of 2017. No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Vellattanjur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of an appeal (Ext.P3) filed against an assessment order (Ext.P1). The assessment order was passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Guruvayoor. The procedural history involves the filing of the appeal before the first respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals) against the assessment order. The amount in dispute is not specified.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the pending appeal filed by the petitioner? The petitioner contended that they have filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and sought a direction for its disposal. The revenue did not record any specific contentions in the judgment regarding the disposal of the appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the first respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the assessment order Ext.P1. 2. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. AMIT RAWAL JUDGE nak
WP(C).No.10639 OF 2020(D) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 8.12.2017 FOR THE YEAR 2010-2011. EXHIBIT P2OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 8.12.2017. EXHIBIT P3OF THE APPEAL DATED 5.1.2018. EXHIBIT P4OF THE ORDER DATED 23.8.2019. EXHIBIT P5OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 30.8.2019. EXHIBIT P6OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.7.2019 IN W.A.NO.1536 OF 2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026