THE KUMARAMPUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P-373, vs. THE ADDL/JOINT/DY./ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court admitted the writ petition. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal at the earliest. Additionally, the respondents were directed to take up Ext.P3 stay petition and hear and dispose of it within three months. The Court also ordered that coercive steps for recovery shall remain stayed until the disposal of the stay petition. The judgment does not record any specific findings on the merits of the appeal or stay petition, as the disposal was based on the procedural request for expeditious action.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Kumaranputhur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petition sought a direction for the disposal of its appeal (Ext.P2) and stay petition (Ext.P3). The respondents are the National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi, and the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The petitioner is represented by its Secretary in Charge. The Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department accepted notice for the respondents.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's appeal and stay petition? (Question of procedure) Assessee's Contention: The assessee's limited prayer is for the expeditious disposal of its pending appeal and stay petition before the revenue authorities. Revenue's Contention: The Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department accepted notice for the respondents, indicating no objection to the limited prayer for disposal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Admit. Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a disposal of Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition. In view of the limited prayer made in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal at the earliest. There will be a further direction to the respondents to take up Ext.P3 stay petition and hear and dispose of the same within three months. Coercive steps for recovery shall remain stayed till the disposal of the stay petition. T.R.RAVI JUDGE dsn
WP(C) NO. 15921 OF 2022 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15921/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16. Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026