THE KUMARAPUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.P-373, vs. THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT /DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court admitted the writ petition and directed the respondents to hear and dispose of the appeal (Ext.P2) at the earliest. Furthermore, the respondents were directed to take up the stay petition (Ext.P3) and hear and dispose of it within three months. The Court also ordered that coercive steps for recovery would remain stayed until the disposal of the stay petition. No specific findings on the merits of the appeal or stay petition were made, as the order was based on the limited prayer for expeditious disposal.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Kumaraputhur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction for the disposal of its appeal (Ext.P2) and stay petition (Ext.P3). The respondents are the Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi, and the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The petitioner sought expeditious disposal of its pending appeal and stay petition before the revenue authorities.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the respondents to dispose of the pending appeal filed by the petitioner? (Question of procedure) Assessee's Contention: The assessee primarily sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of its appeal and stay petition, as evidenced by the limited prayer in the writ petition. Revenue's Contention: The Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department accepted notice, indicating no specific argument against the prayer for disposal was recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Admit. Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a disposal of Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition. In view of the limited prayer made in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal at the earliest. There will be a further direction to the respondents to take up Ext.P3 stay petition and hear and dispose of the same within three months. Coercive steps for recovery shall remain stayed till the disposal of the stay petition. T.R.RAVI JUDGE dsn
WP(C) NO. 15939 OF 2022 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15939/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DT.29.3.22 Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.27.4. 22. Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.27.4.22.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026