M/S.COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala observed that an out-of-turn hearing cannot be granted solely because a party approaches the court. While the petitioner's main grievance regarding a refund was redressed, their appeals for assessment years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 were still pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The court did not grant the request for an out-of-turn hearing. Instead, it closed the writ petition with a request to the 4th respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) to decide the pending appeals as per their terms, implying that the appeals should be decided in due course according to the established procedures and timelines.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, M/s. Cochin International Airport Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner's primary grievance concerning a refund had been resolved, and the refund had been received. However, appeals for assessment years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 remained pending before the 4th respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The petitioner sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of these pending appeals. The respondents were the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Centralized Processing Center), the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to an out-of-turn hearing for the pending appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner sought expeditious disposal of their pending appeals for assessment years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015, implying a request for priority hearing given that their main grievance regarding refund had been redressed. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the revenue regarding the expeditious disposal of appeals. The court's observation suggests that approaching the court does not automatically warrant an out-of-turn hearing.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR TUE AY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 22TH POUSHA, 1942 WP(C).No.16116 OF 2020(L) PETITIONER: M/S.COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., 35, 4TH FLOOR, GCDA COMPLEX, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 031, REPRESENTED BY ITS AIRPORT DIRECTOR MR.A. CHANDRAKUMARAN NAIR. BY ADVS. SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.) SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ISAAC THOMAS SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA SMT.ZAINAB ZEBAIBRAHIM P.M. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENERAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 018. 2 TH COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CENTER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE 560 500. 3 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1 (1), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 018. 4 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AREECKAL MANSION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI 682 036. R1-4 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.) R1-4 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.16116 OF 2020(L) 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 12th day of January 2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. He has submits that the main grievance regarding refund is already redressed and the petitioner has already received refund of taxes paid by him. Learned counsel further submits that appeals for assessment years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 are still pending before the 4th respondent and those appeals to be directed to be decided expeditiously. In my considered view, out of turn hearing cannot be granted only because the party approaches the court in the matter. In this view of the matter, this petition is closed with the request to the 4th respondent to decide pending appeals as per their terms. A.M.BADAR N //// PA to Judge JUDGE
WP(C).No.16116 OF 2020(L) 3
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026