ARUVIPURAM SREE NARAYANA DHARMA PARIPALANA YOGAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the 3rd respondent (National Faceless Appeal Centre) to provide a link to the petitioner for uploading a stay petition within ten days. Upon the petitioner filing a stay petition within two weeks of the link being provided, any demand pursuant to the assessment order (Ext.P1) shall be kept in abeyance until the Appellate Authority decides on the stay petition. The court's decision focuses on facilitating the filing of a stay petition and suspending recovery pending that decision, rather than ruling on the merits of the assessment or the appeal itself.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Aruppuram Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner was aggrieved by proceedings initiated to recover amounts due under an order of assessment (Ext.P1), while an appeal against this assessment order was pending before the First Appellate Authority (Ext.P4). The petitioner sought relief from the High Court concerning the recovery proceedings during the pendency of their appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether recovery proceedings can be initiated for amounts due under an assessment order when an appeal against that order is pending before the appellate authority? The petitioner argued that recovery proceedings should not be initiated while their appeal is pending. They sought a stay on such recovery. The revenue, represented by the Standing Counsel, was heard. The judgment does not explicitly detail the revenue's specific arguments or reliance on any authorities or precedents.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 order of assessment, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 appeal before the First Appellate Authority. The petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that proceedings are being initiated to recover amounts due under Ext.P1, pending consideration of the appeal.
Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Department also.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that the 3rd respondent shall provide a link to the petitioner for uploading a stay petition within ten days from today. On the petitioner filing a stay petition within a period of two weeks from the date on which the link is provided to the petitioner, any demand pursuant to Ext.P1 order of assessment shall be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken by the Appellate Authority on the stay petition to be filed by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt
WP(C) NO. 25581 OF 2022 3
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026