LAKSHMI VENUGOPAL, vs. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court directed the 5th respondent, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, to consider and pass orders on the stay petitions (Ext.P4 series) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. An opportunity of hearing was to be granted to the petitioner. Furthermore, the Court ordered that all coercive proceedings against the petitioner, pursuant to the assessment orders (Ext.P1 series), shall be kept in abeyance until a decision is taken on the stay petitions. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Lakshmi Venugopal, is aggrieved by assessment orders for assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08. She has filed second appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, the 5th respondent. Along with the appeals, she has also filed stay petitions. The petitioner apprehends coercive recovery proceedings before her stay petitions are considered. Consequently, she has filed this writ petition seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of the stay petitions and a stay on coercive proceedings until a decision is rendered on the stay applications.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the ITAT (5th respondent) should be directed to consider and pass orders on the stay petitions filed by the petitioner (Ext.P4 series) within a specified period? (Question of procedure) 2. Whether coercive proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to the assessment orders (Ext.P1 series) should be kept in abeyance until a decision is taken on the stay petitions? (Question of procedure) Assessee's Contention: The petitioner contends that she has filed second appeals and stay petitions before the ITAT and fears coercive action before her stay applications are heard and decided. She seeks a direction for the timely disposal of these stay petitions and a stay on recovery proceedings. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the respondents. However, the court considered the submissions of both the petitioner and the respondents.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 and Ext.P1(a) to Ext.P1(e) series of orders of assessment relating to assessment years, 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, petitioner has preferred second appeals before the 5th respondent, copies of which are produced as Ext.P3 series. Petitions for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment orders have also been filed as Ext.P4 series. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before the petitions for stay are considered. Hence, this writ petition.
Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the ..4.. respondents, I am of the opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 5th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 and Ext.P4(a) to Ext.P4(e) series of stay petitions, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 and Ext.P1(a) to Ext.P1(e) shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE bka/17.01.2022 ..5..
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026