UNITED NURSES ASSOCIATION vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of the writ petition by directing the 3rd respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) to consider and pass orders on the stay petition (Ext.P3) filed in the appeal (Ext.P2) as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. The Court further directed that further proceedings for recovery of any amount due under the penalty order (Ext.P1) shall be kept in abeyance until orders are passed on the stay petition. The Court noted the limited nature of the relief sought by the petitioner.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, United Nurses Association, is challenging an order of penalty for the assessment year 2018-2019, issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner filed an appeal against this penalty order before the 3rd respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center, New Delhi, along with a stay petition. While the appeal and stay petition were pending, the petitioner received a notice proposing recovery of the penalty amount. This writ petition was filed seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of the stay petition.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the 3rd respondent should be directed to consider and pass orders on the stay petition expeditiously? (Question of procedure) Assessee's Contention: The petitioner seeks a direction for the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition filed in Ext.P2 appeal as expeditiously as possible, and for further proceedings for recovery of the penalty amount to be kept in abeyance until such orders are passed. Revenue's Contention: The judgment records that the Standing Counsel was heard, but does not detail their specific arguments regarding the stay petition or recovery proceedings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of penalty for the assessment year 2018-2019 under the provision of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 stay petition before the 3rd respondent. The petitioner has been served with Ext.P4 notice proposing to recover the amount due under Ext.P1 order imposing penalty, pending consideration of the stay petition by the Appellate Authority
Heard learned Standing Counsel also.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case considering the limited nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner, the writ petition will stand disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition filed in Ext.P2 appeal as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till such time as orders are passed on Ext.P3, further proceedings for recovery of any amount due under Ext.P1 shall be kept in abeyance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats
W.P.(C)No.38785/2022 3
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026