SHINI SHAJAN, vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the leave sought by the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The court held that the withdrawal would be without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The specific merits of any underlying tax dispute were not adjudicated upon, as the matter was disposed of on the petitioner's request for withdrawal. No other issues were expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Shini Shajan, is the legal representative acting on behalf of the legal heirs of late Shajimon Mathew, proprietor of M/s. Mathew & Sons. The respondents are the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and the Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi. The petitioner filed a writ petition (civil) before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. The assessment year(s) and the specific order or action under challenge are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the writ petition and its subsequent listing before the court.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition, without prejudice to the right to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action? (Question of procedure) Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same course of action. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contention from the revenue regarding the withdrawal of the petition.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same course of action. Leave sought for is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. C. S. DIAS JUDGE SKP/12-06
WPC No.18830 of 2023 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18830/2023 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21- 05-2021 EXHIBIT P2OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED24-05- 2021 EXHIBIT P3OF THE ADJOURNMENT LETTER DATED NIL EXHIBIT P4OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 17-06- 2021 EXHIBIT P5OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 17/06/2021 EXHIBIT P6OF THE PETITION U/S. 264 TO THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DATED NIL EXHIBIT P7OF THE ORDER OF THE 2 ND RESPONDENT DATED 24-03-2023 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NILP.A.TO JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026