IRFAN AK vs. THE UNION OF INDIA, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of the Writ Petition (Criminal) in light of its previous order dated 09.10.2023 in Crl.M.C.No.7793/2023. The Court noted that the earlier order had already modified the impugned order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Kozhikode, after hearing the petitioner in the present case. Therefore, no further orders were deemed necessary in this specific writ petition. The reasoning for the modification in the prior order is not detailed in this judgment. The operative direction is that the writ petition is disposed of based on the previous order.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Irfan A.K., filed a Writ Petition (Criminal) seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents 3 and 4 (Deputy Director of Income Tax and Principal Director of Income Tax) to deposit Rs. 14,86,500/- before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Kozhikode, irrespective of pending assessment proceedings. The petitioner also sought a direction for the Magistrate to consider and dispose of a fresh application for the release of seized amounts upon deposit. The impugned order under challenge was a common order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Kozhikode, in Crl.M.P.Nos.2169/2022 and 573/2022. The High Court noted that it had already modified the Magistrate's order on 09.10.2023 in Crl.M.C.No.7793/2023, after hearing the petitioner in the present case.
What were the issues?
1. Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the Income Tax authorities (respondents 3 and 4) to deposit Rs. 14,86,500/- before the Jurisdictional Magistrate Court, Kozhikode, notwithstanding the pendency of assessment proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner argued for the deposit and subsequent release of seized amounts. The respondents' contentions are not recorded in the judgment. 2. Whether the Jurisdictional Magistrate Court should be directed to consider and dispose of a fresh application for the release of seized amounts in a time-bound manner, upon the deposit of the specified sum by the Income Tax authorities. The petitioner sought this direction. The respondents' contentions are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT This Writ Petition (Crl.) is filed with the following prayers: “(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondents 3 and 4 to deposit Rs. 14,86,500/- (Rupees Fourteen Lakhs Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Only) before the Juri ictional Magistrate Court forthwith disregarding the pendency of assessment proceedings against the petitioner. (ii) Issue a direction to the Juri ictional Magistrate Court directing that, upon depositing the amount by the respondents 3 and 4. If the petitioner files a fresh application to release the amounts seized, the same is to be considered and disposed in a time bound manner. (iii) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense the petitioners from filing the true English translation of the exhibits produced along with this Writ Petition. (iv) Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; and (v) award costs”
The impugned order is a common order passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.2169/2022 and 573/2022 by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Kozhikode. This Court as per the order dated 09.10.2023 in Crl.M.C.No.7793/2023, already modified the above order after hearing the petitioner in this case also. In such circumstances, no further order is necessary in this case. Therefore, this Writ petition (Crl.) is disposed of in the light of the order dated 09.10.2023 in Crl.M.C.No.7793/2023. P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN DM JUDGE
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026