DR. THURUTHIYATH SUMA vs. ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/34783/2022HC KeralaKLHC01074325202201 November 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the National Faceless Appeal Centre to provide a link to the petitioner for filing her stay petition within two weeks of receiving a certified copy of the judgment. The Court further ordered that if the petitioner files the stay petition within ten days of receiving the link, coercive steps to recover amounts due under the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance until the National Faceless Appeal Centre decides the stay petition. The Court did not decide on the merits of the stay petition itself, but facilitated its filing.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Dr. Thuruthiyad Ssuma, received an order of assessment for assessment year 2017-18. She filed an appeal before the National Faceless Appeal Centre but did not file a stay petition. Subsequently, she received a notice of demand and filed a stay petition before the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner. The Revenue contended that the stay petition should have been filed before the National Faceless Appeal Centre, which has jurisdiction under the National Faceless Assessment/Appeal scheme, and the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner lacks jurisdiction. The Revenue offered to provide a link for uploading the stay petition.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner has the jurisdiction to entertain a stay petition filed by the petitioner after the National Faceless Appeal Scheme came into force, or if the National Faceless Appeal Centre is the appropriate authority. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner filed a stay petition before the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner. (Implied by filing the petition there). Revenue's Contention: The petitioner must file the stay petition before the National Faceless Appeal Centre, as the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner has no jurisdiction to hear stay petitions filed after the National Faceless Assessment/Appeal scheme came into force. The Revenue offered to provide a link for uploading the stay petition to the National Faceless Appeal Centre.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 34783 OF 2022 PETITIONER: DR. THURUTHIYATH SUMA AGED 36 YEARS SREEVALSAM, KATTAYAD ROAD, SULTHAN BATHERY S.O., WAYANAD, KERALA, PIN - 673592 BY ADVS. S.ARUN RAJ C.T.SUJA ARJUN S.RAJ RESPONDENTS: 1 ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110003 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110003 3 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673001. 4 INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, KALPETTA, SULTHAN BATHERY ROAD, KAINATTY, KALPETTA, WAYANAD, PIN – 673122. 5 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673001. BY ADV JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM (SC) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P (C) No.34783/2022 -2- J U D G M E N T The petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment for assessment year 2017- 18 under the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal before the National Faceless Appeal Centre. However the petitioner did not file any stay petition along with the appeal. The petitioner received Ext.P3 notice of demand, following which the petitioner filed Ext.P4 before the jurisdictional appellate Commissioner. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Department states that the petitioner must file the stay petition before the National Faceless Appeal Centre and not before the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner, who has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal/stay petition filed by the petitioner after the National Faceless Appeal Assessment/Appeal scheme came into force. It is submitted that if the petitioner so wishes to file a stay petition a link can be provided to the petitioner for uploading the stay petition. 3. Hence this writ petition is disposed of directing the National Faceless Appeal Centre to provide a link to the petitioner for filing stay petition in Ext.P2 appeal within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. If the petitioner files a stay petition within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of the link, further coercive steps against the petitioner to recover the amounts due under Ext.P1 shall be kept in abeyance till the stay petition is decided by National Faceless Appeal Centre. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMG

W.P (C) No.34783/2022 -3- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34783/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20-03-2022 UNDER SECTION 147 R.W.S 144 AND 144B OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2017-18 ALONG WITH THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL E-FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017- 18 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28-09-2022 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR THE AY 2017-18 ADDRESSED TO 2ND RESPONDENT:- CIT (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI FORWARDED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT JURISDICTIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KOZHIKODE ALONG THE COVERING LETTER Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30-11-2021 IN W.P.(C) NO. 26935/2021 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →