CIT vs. -DO-
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh I. T. C. No. 50 of 1992 Date of decision : 18.8.2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Haryana, Rohtak ..... Petitioner vs M/s. Surjit & Surinder Investment (P) Limited, Yamunanagar
..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. For reasons recorded in separate detailed order passed today in I. T. C. No. 83 of 1991 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Haryana, Rohtak vs M/s. Surjit & Surinder Investment (P) Limited, Yamunanagar, the present petition is dismissed. ( Rajesh Bindal) Judge 18.8.2008 (Hemant Gupta) vs.
Judge
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026