TURF ADVERTISING AND MARKETING COMPANY PVT LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), KOLKATA AND ORS

PDF · subscribers
WPO/1623/2022HC CalcuttaWBCHCO002203202205 April 2022Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present :- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Md. Nizamuddin W.P.O. No. 1621 of 2022 NIRAJ KUMAR AGARWAL Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 50(1), KOLKATA AND ORS. With W.P.O. No. 1622 of 2022, W.P.O. 1623 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 1624 of 2022 For the Petitioners :- Mr. Anil Kumar Dugar, Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, Advocates

For the Respondents :- Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate Dated : 5th April, 2022

MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J. In compliance of my earlier orders, petitioners have already paid the costs to the Office of the High Court Legal Services Committee, Calcutta and filed receipts which may be kept with the records. These costs shall be utilised for the purpose of welfare of the street children. In view of the fact, no further order is needed to be passed. Accordingly, all these writ petitions stand disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.) TR/

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →