THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KHODAY INDIA LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that in view of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated December 10, 2015, which enhances the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 20 lacs and applies retrospectively to pending appeals, and considering that the tax effect in the present appeal is below this limit, the appeal stands dismissed. The reasoning is based solely on the application of the circular and the stated tax effect. No other issue was decided on merits. The operative direction is the dismissal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
This appeal was filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore. The assessee is M/s Khoday India Ltd. The appeal was filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue's counsel submitted a Circular No. 21/2015 dated December 10, 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). This circular enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 20 lacs and clarified that it would apply retrospectively to pending appeals. The Revenue's counsel stated that the tax effect in the present appeal was below the specified limit of Rs. 20 lacs.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is to be dismissed in light of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which enhances the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 20 lacs, and the tax effect in the present appeal being below this limit. Contentions: Assessee: No specific contentions recorded in the judgment. Revenue: The Revenue contended that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specified limit of Rs. 20 lacs, and therefore, in view of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, the appeal should be dismissed. The Revenue relied on Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA No. 399/2012
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
THE ASST. COMMISSISONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11 (5), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
..APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND & MS. PREETHI.J.D.-ADVs)
AND
M/S KHODAY INDIA LTD., BREWERY HOUSE, 7TH MILE, KANAKAPURA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 002.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRIYUTHS. A.SHANKAR & M.LAVA-ADVs)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.211/BANG/2012 DATED: 18.07.2012, ETC.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue has placed before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes, wherein the monetary limit of the tax effect for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to Rs.20 lacs. In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has been clarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Learned counsel for the appellants has stated that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specified limit of Rs.20 lacs.
Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE TL
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026