CIT LUDHIANA vs. GURMAIL KAUR TRUST 655 LUDHIAN
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh held that the question of law referred by the ITAT was identical to a question previously decided by the same court. In a prior judgment dated April 16, 2004, in ITR Nos. 47 to 49 of 1989 – The Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana vs Smt. Gurmail Kaur Trust, Ludhiana, the court had already ruled against the revenue on an identical issue. Therefore, following its own precedent, the High Court answered the referred question against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The reference was disposed of accordingly, implying that the ITAT's finding that the trust was not discretionary and not assessable under Section 164 was upheld.
What were the facts?
This case involves a reference of a question of law by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench, to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The reference arises from the ITAT's order dated June 6, 1997, in I.T.A. No. 942/Chandi/1993, pertaining to the assessment year 1991-92. The applicant is the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana, and the respondent is Smt. Gurmail Kaur Trust. The core of the dispute concerns whether the trust could be treated as a discretionary trust for assessment purposes under Section 164 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that there is no legal infirmity insofar as this trust is concerned and that it could not be treated as discretionary one to be assessed as per the provisions of section 164 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contention: The assessee implicitly argues that the trust is not discretionary and therefore not subject to assessment under Section 164. This is inferred from the ITAT's finding that there was no legal infirmity and the trust could not be treated as discretionary. Revenue's Contention: The revenue, by seeking this reference, contends that the trust should have been treated as a discretionary one and assessed under Section 164 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The revenue is challenging the ITAT's decision on this point.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITR 74 of 1999 (O&M) The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana .... Applicant vs Smt. Gurmail Kaur Trust, 655, Gurdev Nagar, Ludhiana ... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the revenue. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the assessee. Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, has referred the following question of law for opinion of this court arising out of its order dated 6.6.1997 in I.T.A. No. 942/Chandi/1993 for the assessment year 1991-92:- “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that there is no legal infirmity insofar as this trust is concerned and that it could not be treated as discretionary one to be assessed as per the provisions of section 164 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.” Learned counsel for the parties fairly submit that identical question has been answered against the revenue vide order of this court dated 16.4.2004 in ITR Nos. 47 to 49 of 1989 – The Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana vs Smt. Gurmail Kaur Trust, Ludhiana. In view of the above, the question referred is answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The reference is disposed of. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge 21.12.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge
More judgments on Section 164
- Anshul Jagruchi Trust, Laxman Singh Block… vs Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2), C.R…ITA 1513/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Heard15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Chiragh Social Welfare Society, Chiragh… vs Assessing Officer Ward 30(1) Delhi, DelhiITA 2658/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2024-25
- Lajwanti Moorjani Family Trust, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1193/HYD/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2024-2025
- Choksi Subhdraben Chhotalal, Surat vs Ward 2(2)(1), SuratITA 585/SRT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Choksi Subhdraben Chhotalal, Surat vs Ward 2(2)(1), SuratITA 576/SRT/2026[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026