HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE APEX BANK LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the application for placing on record Annexure A-9 (Form-3) for the reasons recorded therein. Subsequently, the Court allowed the application for withdrawal of the main appeal (ITA-83-2020) in view of the averments made. The dismissal of the appeal was made with the liberty granted to the appellant to revive the appeal in case the designated authority under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020, does not accept the declaration filed by the applicant. Consequently, any pending civil miscellaneous applications related to the main case were also disposed of. The Court did not decide the merits of the original appeal.
What were the facts?
The appellant, The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd., filed an appeal (ITA-83-2020) before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The appeal was against an order or action by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and another respondent. The appellant also filed two civil miscellaneous applications (CM-7366-CII-2021 and CM-7367-CII-2021). CM-7366-CII-2021 was for placing on record Annexure A-9, which is Form-3. CM-7367-CII-2021 was an application praying for the withdrawal of the appeal. The reason for withdrawal was the appellant's desire to avail the benefit of the Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020, with liberty to revive the appeal if the declaration filed under the scheme was not accepted by the designated authority. The respondents accepted notice and had no objection to the application for withdrawal being allowed.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the application for placing on record Annexure A-9 (Form-3) should be allowed? 2. Whether the appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn in light of the appellant's intention to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020, with liberty to revive? Assessee's Contention: The assessee sought to place on record Annexure A-9 (Form-3) and prayed for withdrawal of the appeal to avail the benefit of the Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020, with liberty to revive the appeal if the declaration filed under the scheme was not accepted. Revenue's Contention: The revenue, through its Senior Standing Counsel, accepted notice of the application for withdrawal and stated that it had no objection if the application was allowed.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103
CM-7366-CII-2021 and CM-7367-CII-2021 in/and ITA-83-2020 (O&M) Decided on : 31.8.2021 The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd. ....Appellant VS The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present: Mr. Avneet Singh, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) CM-7366-CII-2021 This is an application for placing on record Annexure A-9 i.e. Form-3. For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed and Annexure A-9 i.e. Form-3 is taken on record. CM-7367-CII-2021 This is an application praying for withdrawal of the appeal as the appellant is desirous of availing the benefit of the Scheme Vivad-se- Vishwas Act, 2020 with liberty to revive the appeal in case the designated authority does not accept declaration filed by the applicant. Notice of the application. ANURADHA 2021.09.01 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CM-7366-CII-2021 and -2- CM-7367-CII-2021 in/and ITA-83-2020 (O&M) Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel appears and accepts notice of the application on behalf of the non- applicants/respondents and states that he has no objection if the application is allowed. For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is taken up on Board today itself. Main case In view of the averments made in the application bearing CM-7367-CII-2021, the main case is dimissed as withdrawn with liberty mentioned above. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI)
JUDGE (ALKA SARIN) JUDGE 31.8.2021 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned - Yes/No Whether reportable - Yes/No ANURADHA 2021.09.01 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026