PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 CHANDIGARH vs. DR ITM LIMITED CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA/71/2022HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01031443202129 January 2025Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA1 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-71-2022(O&M) Date of decision: 29.01.2025 Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-I, Chandigarh … Appellant Versus Dr. ITM Limited … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Standing Counsel, for the appellant-Revenue. *** ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in the wake of Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, read with Circular No.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, the appeal be disposed of as not pressed. Ordered accordingly. ( Arun Palli )

Judge 29.01.2025 Rajan ( Sudeepti Sharma ) Judge Whether speaking / reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RAJAN KUMAR 2025.01.30 10:34 I am approving this document

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →