COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GURUGRAM vs. MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

PDF · subscribers
ITA/71/2021HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01049433202024 September 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has dismissed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram. The Court has stated that the detailed reasons for this dismissal are recorded in a separate order of even date passed in ITA No. 41 of 2021, which also pertains to the same appellant and respondent. As the specific issues and reasoning are not elaborated in this excerpt, the precise findings on each issue, the logic leading to the decision, and the ratio decidendi are not available. Consequently, the operative directions are not specified here, nor is any issue expressly left undecided. The dismissal of the appeal is the only outcome explicitly stated.

What were the facts?

This case involves an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram, against M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust. The specific assessment year(s) and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt. The procedural history that matters is that this appeal is being decided in conjunction with ITA No. 41 of 2021, with the High Court referring to a separate, detailed order of even date for the reasons. The amount in dispute is not stated. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh is the authority passing this judgment.

What were the issues?

The High Court was to decide the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram. The specific questions of law or mixed law and fact that the Tribunal had to decide are not explicitly stated in this excerpt. The judgment indicates that the detailed reasons for the decision are recorded in a separate order concerning ITA No. 41 of 2021. Therefore, the specific arguments of the assessee and the revenue on the issues are not available in this provided text. The judgment does not record any arguments for either side.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 71 of 2021 (O&M) Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram … Appellant versus M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISHT Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate, and Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. The appeal is dismissed. For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in ITA No. 41 of 2021 – Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram vs M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE 24.09.2024 (SANJAY VASHISHT) vs JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VARINDER SINGH 2024.09.27 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →