THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, LUDHIANA vs. M/S IOL CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana did not decide the appeal on its merits. Instead, the Court passed an order stating that for the detailed order, reference should be made to ITA-517-2008 titled 'M/s Vardhman Textiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.', passed on the same date. Any pending applications were also disposed of in terms of that detailed order. No specific finding on any issue, reasoning, or ratio decidendi is provided in this order. No operative directions are given, other than the disposal of pending applications and the reference to the other judgment.
What were the facts?
The appeal is filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against M/s IOL Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The assessment year(s) are not specified in this order. The order or action under challenge is not detailed, nor is the authority that passed it. The amount in dispute is not stated. The procedural history is that this High Court order is passed for orders, referring to a detailed order of even date in a different case, ITA-517-2008 titled 'M/s Vardhman Textiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.'. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
What were the issues?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana was to decide the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The specific issues or questions of law that the Tribunal had to decide are not recorded in this order. The contentions of the assessee and the revenue are also not detailed. The order explicitly states that it is for orders and refers to another judgment for the detailed reasoning. Therefore, no specific arguments or legal provisions were discussed or relied upon in this particular order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****
204-6
ITA-71-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.02.2026
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ...Appellant Versus
M/S IOL CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present:- Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Nikita Garg, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Vidhul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel for the appellant-Income Tax
Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate and Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate for respondent/assessee
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in ITA-517-2008 titled as ‘M/s Vardhman Textiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.’. 2.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL)
JUDGE February 26, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable:
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.02.27 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026