SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the application for withdrawal of the main appeal. The Court noted that the hearing was preponed to the current date upon the oral request of the learned counsel for the applicant-appellant. For the reasons set out in the application, which were duly supported by an affidavit, the application was allowed. Consequently, the appeal, along with any associated applications, was dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for by the appellant. No decision on the merits of the appeal was made.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Exchange Customer Protection Fund), filed an application to withdraw the main appeal (ITA-70-2024 O&M). The appeal was against an order or action by the Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Jalandhar. The hearing for the appeal was preponed to January 23, 2025, upon the oral request of the appellant's counsel. The application for withdrawal was supported by an affidavit and was allowed by the High Court.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Exchange Customer Protection Fund) against the Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Jalandhar, should be permitted to be withdrawn. The appellant's counsel made an oral request for withdrawal of the main appeal. The respondent's contentions are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-1057-CII-2025 in/and ITA-70-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 23.01.2025
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Exchange Customer Protection Fund)
….Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Jalandhar
….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate, and
Mr. Siddhant Jain, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent.
****
ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral)
This is an application for withdrawal of the main appeal.
On the oral request made by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant, hearing in the appeal is preponed to today, i.e. 23.01.2025.
For the reasons set out in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Accordingly, as prayed for, the appeal, along with applications, is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARUN PALLI)
JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 23.01.2025 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No
AMIT KUMAR 2025.01.24 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026