PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKENDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

PDF · subscribers
ITA/60/2021HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01049427202024 September 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dismissed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram. The dismissal was based on detailed reasons provided in a separate order of even date concerning ITA No. 41 of 2021, which involved the same parties. As the specific reasoning for the dismissal is not elaborated in this excerpt, the ratio decidendi cannot be determined. The operative direction is the dismissal of the appeal. No issues were expressly left undecided, as the appeal itself was disposed of.

What were the facts?

This is an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram, against M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh is hearing the appeal. The judgment states that the appeal is dismissed for orders, referring to detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in ITA No. 41 of 2021, which involves the same appellant and respondent. The specific assessment year(s) and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt, nor is the amount in dispute.

What were the issues?

The High Court was to decide the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram. The judgment does not explicitly state the questions of law or fact that the Tribunal had to decide. It also does not record the specific contentions of either the assessee (M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust) or the revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax). The decision to dismiss the appeal is based on the reasoning provided in a related case, ITA No. 41 of 2021, which is not included here. Therefore, the specific arguments and legal provisions relied upon by each side are not discernible from this excerpt.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 60 of 2021 (O&M) Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram … Appellant versus M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISHT Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate, and Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. The appeal is dismissed. For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in ITA No. 41 of 2021 – Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Gurugram vs M/s Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE 24.09.2024 (SANJAY VASHISHT) vs JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VARINDER SINGH 2024.09.27 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →