PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GURGAON vs. M/S COMVERSE NETWORK SYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the present appeal is covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of the same Court in ITA No. 5 of 2016, decided on 25.04.2016 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs M/s Carrier Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Limited). The Court found that the questions of law in both appeals were identical. Consequently, based on the precedent set by the Division Bench, the High Court dismissed the present appeal. No specific findings on the merits of the case were made, as the decision was based on the principle of parity with the earlier judgment. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon (the Revenue) against Comverse Network Systems India Pvt. Ltd. (the Assessee). The assessment year(s) are not specified in the judgment. The appeal challenges an order or action, the nature of which is not detailed. The procedural history is limited to the filing of this appeal before the High Court. The amount in dispute is not mentioned. The judgment indicates that the present appeal is identical to a previous case decided by a Division Bench of the same High Court.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the questions of law in this appeal are identical to those decided in ITA No. 5 of 2016 titled Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs M/s Carrier Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Limited (decided on 25.04.2016)? (Question of law) Assessee's contentions: Not recorded. Revenue's contentions: The Revenue's counsel agreed that the present appeal is covered by the judgment in the aforementioned Carrier Air Conditioning case. No specific arguments were presented beyond this agreement.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-510-2017 (O&M) Date of decision:- 22.02.2018
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon ...Appellant Versus
Comverse Network Systems India Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:- Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate,
for the appellant. * * * * S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL)
It is agreed that this appeal is covered by the judgement of a Division Bench of this Court decided on 25.04.2016 (wrongly typed as 25.04.2006) in ITA No. 5 of 2016 titled as Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs M/s Carrier Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Limited. The questions of law are the same in both the appeals. 2.
In view thereof, the present appeal is dismissed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE 22.02.2018 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Amodh Sharma 2018.02.22 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026