THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. ST. FRANCIS CONVENT SCHOOL, JANDIALA GURU, PAN AAHTS1635E
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal as prayed for. The Court clarified that the withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue would not be considered an affirmation of the ITAT's order on merits. Furthermore, the legal issue, as claimed by the revenue, was left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. The miscellaneous application (CM-25692-CII-2017) was also dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh (the revenue) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The respondent is St. Francis Convent School, Jandiala Guru. The tax effect involved in the appeal was ₹18,54,090. The revenue sought to withdraw the appeal based on Circular No. 03/2018 dated July 11, 2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The revenue also requested liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal if circumstances warranted.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn by the revenue in light of CBDT Circular No. 03/2018, and if liberty should be granted to the revenue to revive the appeal. Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the assessee. The assessee was represented by senior counsel. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue, through its learned counsel, stated that due to the tax effect of ₹18,54,090, it had instructions to withdraw the appeal in terms of CBDT Circular No. 03/2018. The revenue prayed for liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-507-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.8.2018 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh ...Appellant. Versus St. Francis Convent School, Jandiala Guru ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN. PRESENT: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate and Mr. Aniket D. Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is ` 18,54,090/-, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of Circular No.03/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. 3. CM-25692-CII-2017 is also dismissed as withdrawn. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE August 23, 2018 (AVNEESH JHINGAN) gbs JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No GURBACHAN SINGH 2018.08.28 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026