GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II CHD

PDF · subscribers
ITA/427/2014HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01109582201414 January 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in this judgment, has not provided any specific findings or reasoning on the merits of the appeal filed by GEATER Mohali Area Development Authority. Instead, it explicitly states that the decision for this appeal is being made based on the detailed order passed in a connected case, ITA-599-2006, titled 'Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-I'. Therefore, the specific ratio decidendi and operative directions for this particular appeal are not discernible from the provided text, as they are contingent on the outcome of the referenced connected case. No issue was expressly left undecided.

What were the facts?

This is an appeal filed by the GEATER Mohali Area Development Authority against the Commissioner of Income Tax-II. The assessment year(s) and the specific order or action under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history is limited to the fact that this appeal is being decided based on a detailed order passed in a connected case, ITA-599-2006 titled 'Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-I'. Any pending applications have been disposed of.

What were the issues?

The judgment does not explicitly state the specific issues that the Tribunal had to decide. Consequently, the arguments of the assessee and the revenue on these issues are also not recorded. The judgment refers to a detailed order in a connected case for the decision, implying that the substantive issues were addressed in that separate order. Therefore, no questions of law or fact, nor any contentions from either side, can be identified from this excerpt.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 201-3

ITA-427-2014 Date of Decision: 14.01.2026

GEATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

...Appellant Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II

…Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present:- Mr. B.M. Monga, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate for the appellant

Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Advocate

for respondent-Income Tax

*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in ITA-599-2006 titled as ‘Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-I’. 2.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)

JUDGE

(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL)

JUDGE January 14, 2026 Deepak DPA

Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No

Whether Reportable

Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.01.15 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →