COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SANJAY JAN
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that it was bound by its previous judgment in ITA No.261 of 2014 (O&M) Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana Vs. Sandeep Jain, decided on September 29, 2014. Since the present appeal (ITA No.417 of 2014) was filed against the same ITAT order that was challenged in the earlier appeal, the principles and decision in the prior judgment would apply. The Court found no reason to deviate from its earlier ruling. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. The specific findings of the ITAT or the substantive issues that led to the original appeal are not detailed in this judgment, as the decision rests solely on the precedent set by the earlier High Court ruling.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ludhiana, filed an appeal (ITA No.417 of 2014) challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). This appeal pertains to the same ITAT order that was the subject of a previous appeal, ITA No.261 of 2014, filed by the Revenue against the same ITAT order concerning Sandeep Jain. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana had already decided ITA No.261 of 2014 on September 29, 2014. The present appeal was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court is bound by its previous judgment in ITA No.261 of 2014 (O&M) Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana Vs. Sandeep Jain, decided on 29.9.2014, in deciding the present appeal (ITA No.417 of 2014) which arises from the same ITAT order. Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: The Revenue, represented by Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, did not present any specific arguments against being bound by the previous judgment. The judgment implicitly suggests the Revenue's argument would have been to differentiate the present case or argue against the applicability of the prior ruling, but no such arguments are detailed.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.417 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:- 19.03.2015 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ludhiana ...Appellant Versus Sanjay Jain ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant. S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (ORAL) 1. Income Tax Appeal No.261 of 2014 was filed against the same very order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which has been challenged in this appeal. The said appeal was disposed of by an order and judgment of Division Bench of this Court in ITA No.261 of 2014 (O&M) Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana Vs. Sandeep Jain decided on 29.9.2014. We are bound by the said judgment. 2. The appeal is therefore, dismissed. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE 19.03.2015 Meenu MEENU KUMARI 2015.03.20 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
