M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the question of law is to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the respondents. Consequently, the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was set aside. The reasoning for this decision is explicitly stated to be the same as that in Income Tax Appeal No. 408 of 2007, which was disposed of by a separate order and judgment of even date. The High Court directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessee's income in accordance with this decision. No specific issues were left undecided; the appeal was decided on its merits based on the prior judgment.
What were the facts?
The appeal concerns M/s Vardhman Textiles Ltd. (formerly Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd.) against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana, and others. The assessment year in question is 1997-98. The judgment states that the outcome of this appeal will be determined by the decision in a related case, Income Tax Appeal No. 408 of 2007, M/s Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another. This related appeal was disposed of by a separate order and judgment of the same date. The High Court has set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the assessee's income accordingly.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the question of law is to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the respondents. The appellant, M/s Vardhman Textiles Ltd., likely argued for a favorable interpretation of the law concerning their income computation. The respondents, Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and others, would have presented arguments to uphold the Tribunal's order. The judgment indicates that the question of law was decided based on the reasoning in a prior, related appeal (Income Tax Appeal No. 408 of 2007). No specific arguments or reliance on authorities are detailed for this particular appeal, as it was decided based on the precedent set in the other case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Income Tax Appeal No. 409 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2016
M/s Vardhman Textiles Ltd. formerly known as Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd. Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana.
..Appellant Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and others ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL, JUDGE.
Present : Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with
Ms. Rinku Dahiya, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the respondent(s).
****
S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE
It is agreed that the result in this appeal which is in respect of the assessment year 1997-98 will follow the result in Income Tax Appeal No. 408 of 2007 M/s Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another, which we disposed of by a separate order and judgment of even date.
For the reasons stated therein, the question of law is answered in favour of the assessee and against the respondents. The impugned order of the Tribunal is set aside. The Assessing Officer shall compute the assessee’s income accordingly.
(S.J.VAZIFDAR)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(DEEPAK SIBAL) 02.09.2016
JUDGE ‘ravinder’
RAVINDER SHARMA 2016.09.05 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
