THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL, LUDHIANA,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal as prayed for by the appellant. The court noted the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that the order under challenge was also being contested in another appeal (ITA-284-2026) and that the appellant wished to withdraw the current appeal to pursue the other one. The court granted liberty to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty to pursue the other pending appeal.
What were the facts?
The appeal, bearing number ITA-338-2026 (O&M), was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana, against Nice Exports Pvt. Ltd. The appeal was listed for decision on 31.08.2026 before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The counsel for the appellant, representing the Income-tax Department, informed the court that the order under challenge in this appeal was also being challenged in another appeal, ITA-284-2026. Consequently, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the present appeal to pursue the other pending appeal.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal had to decide whether to permit the withdrawal of the appeal. The appellant's contention was that the order under challenge in ITA-338-2026 was also being challenged in ITA-284-2026, and therefore, they wished to withdraw the present appeal to consolidate their pursuit of the matter in the other appeal. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the respondent (Nice Exports Pvt. Ltd.) on this procedural matter.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.180
ITA-338-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 31.08.2026
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana
.…. Appellant Versus Nice Exports Pvt. Ltd. ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present : Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel
Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Junior Standing Counsel
Ms. Nikita Garg, Junior Standing Counsel, for the appellant-Income-tax Department.
* * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1.
The instant appeal is incomplete. 2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order under challenge in this appeal has been challenged in another appeal being ITA-284-2026 and therefore, he be permitted to withdraw this appeal to pursue ITA-284-2026. 3.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
31.08.2026
[SUNISH BINDLISH] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.09.01 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026