THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. ATLAS CYCLES (HARYANA) LTD ALAS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA SONEPAT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting the Revenue the liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal as prayed for. The Court noted that the legal issue claimed by the Revenue was being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. Since the main appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, any pending Civil Miscellaneous applications were also dismissed. The Court did not decide the merits of the case.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak (the Revenue) against Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd. (the Assessee). The assessment year(s) are not specified. The appeal challenges an order or action, the nature of which is not detailed. The amount in dispute is also not explicitly stated, but the tax effect is mentioned as being less than Rs. 1 crore. The procedural history involves the Revenue's decision to withdraw the appeal based on a CBDT circular.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn by the Revenue in light of the CBDT circular dated 8.8.2019 (Circular No. 17/2019) concerning tax effect thresholds for filing appeals. Assessee's Contentions: Not recorded. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue, through its counsel, stated that the tax effect involved is less than Rs. 1 crore and, therefore, it has instructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of the CBDT circular dated 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019. The Revenue prayed for liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal if something survives therein.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 350-8 ITA-329-2017 (O&M) Date of decision :26.08.2019 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak ...... Appellant versus Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd., Atlas Road, Industrial Area, Sonepat ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present : Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent.
*** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue has very fairly stated that since the tax effect involved is less than Rs.1 crore. He has instruction to withdraw the present appeal in view of the circular dated 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayed that liberty be granted to Revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the Revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. Anuradha 2019.08.29 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
ITA-329-2017 (O&M) -2- Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, the pending C.M, if any also stands dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE 26.08.2019 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2019.08.29 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026