CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) LUDHIANA vs. M/S BRIJESHWARI TEXTILES PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal. The order states that the dismissal is for reasons to be seen in an order of even date passed in ITA-89-2021, titled ‘The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Ludhiana vs. Rajinder Kumar’. No specific findings or reasoning pertaining to the present appeal (ITA-149-2021) are provided in this judgment. The operative direction is dismissal of the appeal. All pending miscellaneous applications are also disposed of.
What were the facts?
This is an appeal filed by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) Ludhiana (the appellant/revenue) against M/s Brijeshwari Textiles Pvt. Ltd. (the respondent/assessee). The assessment year(s) are not specified in this order. The appeal challenges an order or action, the details of which are not provided. The procedural history is limited to the filing of this appeal. The judgment itself is dated March 21, 2024.
What were the issues?
The judgment does not record any specific issues that the Tribunal had to decide. It also does not record any arguments made by either the assessee or the revenue. Therefore, no questions of law or fact can be framed, and no contentions can be attributed to either party. The judgment is silent on the specific grounds of appeal or the substance of the dispute.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA-89-2021 (O&M)
2024:PHHC:040849-DB
103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
2024:PHHC:040950-DB ITA-149-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.03.2024
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) Ludhiana
…Appellant
Vs.
M/s Brijeshwari Textiles Pvt. Ltd.
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant.
***
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1.
Dismissed. For reasons, see order of even date, passed in ITA- 89-2021, titled as ‘The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Ludhiana vs. Rajinder Kumar’. 2.
All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE
21.03.2024 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable?
: Yes/No
RAJESH KUMAR 2024.04.02 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026