THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA vs. M/S KBB NUTS PVT LTD. CHABAL LINK ROAD, AMRITSAR
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal was to be dismissed as withdrawn. This decision was based on the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, who, on instructions from the appellant-Department, prayed for the withdrawal of the present Appeal. Consequently, the Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications filed in this case were also disposed of accordingly. The judgment does not delve into any substantive legal issues or provide a ratio decidendi for future citation, as the appeal was withdrawn before any merits were considered.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana against M/s. KBB Nuts Private Ltd. The assessment years are not specified in the provided text. The appeal challenges an order or action, the specifics of which are not detailed. The procedural history indicates that the appeal was presented before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The amount in dispute is not mentioned. The appeal was listed for hearing on March 4, 2024.
What were the issues?
The primary issue before the High Court was whether to proceed with the appeal. The appellant, represented by learned counsel Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Senior Standing Counsel, made a statement on instructions from the appellant-Department. The judgment does not record any arguments from the respondent, M/s. KBB Nuts Private Ltd.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
{2024:PHHC:030407-DB}
106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-148-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.03.2024
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA ..…...Appellant
V/s. M/s. KBB NUTS PRIVATE LTD, DHAPAI CHABAL LINK ROAD, AMRITSAR
….....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant.
*** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant, on instruction from the appellant-Department, prays for withdrawal of the present Appeal. 2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. All pending applications filed in this case shall stand disposed of accordingly.
[SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA]
JUDGE
March 4, 2024
[SUDEEPTI SHARMA] Ess Kay
JUDGE
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes / No Whether Reportable
Yes / No Suresh Kumar 2024.03.05 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026