COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHIVALIK AGRO CHEMICALS, CHANDIGARH
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the issue in this case is indeed covered against the appellant-revenue by the Supreme Court's judgment dated 19.04.2016 in Civil Appeal No. 10061 of 2011; CIT Jammu and another Vs. Ms. Shree Balaji Alloys and other connected appeals. The reasoning is that the Supreme Court's decision on a similar matter binds the High Court. Therefore, the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed. No specific operative directions were given other than the dismissal of the appeal. No issues were expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh (appellant-revenue) against M/s Shivalik Agro Chemical (respondent). The case pertains to an income tax appeal. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh was hearing the appeal. The specific assessment year(s) are not mentioned in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not detailed, other than it being an appeal against an order or action of the revenue. The amount in dispute is not stated.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the issue in this case is covered against the appellant-revenue in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 19.04.2016 in Civil Appeal No. 10061 of 2011; CIT Jammu and another Vs. Ms. Shree Balaji Alloys and other connected appeals. This is a question of law. The appellant-revenue argued that the issue is covered against them by the Supreme Court's decision. The respondent did not present any arguments as the matter was agreed upon based on the Supreme Court's judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 114 of 2012
Date of decision: 06.09.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh
... Appellant
Versus M/s Shivalik Agro Chemical
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. CHIEF JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
----
Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate
for the appellant.
Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Sanghi, Advocate for the respondent.
S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL)
It is agreed that the issue in this case is covered against the appellant-revenue in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 19.04.2016 in Civil Appeal No. 10061 of 2011; CIT Jammu and another Vs. Ms. Shree Balaji Alloys and other connected appeals.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE 06.09.2016 kv
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable
: Yes/No VERMA KUMUD 2016.09.08 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this document Chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026