LB WINES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The petitioner was also granted liberty to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the fresh petition. No decision was made on the merits of any issue, as the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, LB Wines Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition (CWP-37236-2025) before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Income Tax Officer and others. The petition was filed on 21.05.2026. The specific assessment year(s) and the order or action under challenge are not explicitly detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not stated. The procedural history leading to this specific filing is not recorded.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal did not have to decide any issues as the petition was withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The revenue's contentions are not recorded as the matter was disposed of on the petitioner's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 218 (37) CWP-37236-2025 Date of decision : 21.05.2026 LB Wines Pvt. Ltd.
.…. Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer and others
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Standing Counsel, with
Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Junior Standing Counsel,
for the Income Tax Department.
* * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
21.05.2026
[LAPITA BANERJI] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.05.22 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh
More judgments on Section 147A
- M/s. Sree Gopal Agencies vs National Faceless Assessment CentreWP/1196/202611 Oct 2026
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Avadhesh Pareek, AjmerITA 1904/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- S S Services Providers Through Its Partner… vs Deputy Commissioner/ Asst Commissioner of…CWP/22709/202522 Sept 2026
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1… vs Sharmanji Yarns Pvt Ltd Village Lakhowal…ITA/261/202616 Sept 2026
- Dm College of Education vs Income Tax Officer and OthersCWP/12371/20249 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026