VINOD KUMAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS

PDF · subscribers
CWP/3024/2026HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01017785202609 April 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI1 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3024-2026 Date of Decision: 09.04.2026 VINOD KUMAR ... PETITIONER VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Stading Counsel with Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondents. **** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 09.04.2026 smriti Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2026.04.17 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →