PREM SINGH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. Furthermore, the petitioner was granted liberty to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the subsequent petition. The court's decision was based on the petitioner's request to withdraw and pursue the matter with the aforementioned liberties. No decision was made on the merits of the original petition or the validity of Section 147A.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Prem Singh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Income Tax Officer, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana, and others. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The court was informed that the petitioner intended to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and also to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the new petition. No specific assessment year or amount in dispute was mentioned in the provided text.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the writ petition (CWP-20796-2025) with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Revenue's Contention: No specific contention was recorded for the respondents-Income Tax Department in the provided judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216
CWP-20796-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.08.2026 Prem Singh ..... Petitioner
Versus Income Tax Officer, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana and others
..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Standing counsel, Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE 20.08.2026 Satyawan Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SATYAWAN 2026.08.21 18:49 I agree to specified portions of this document
More judgments on Section 147A
- M/s. Sree Gopal Agencies vs National Faceless Assessment CentreWP/1196/202611 Oct 2026
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Avadhesh Pareek, AjmerITA 1904/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- S S Services Providers Through Its Partner… vs Deputy Commissioner/ Asst Commissioner of…CWP/22709/202522 Sept 2026
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1… vs Sharmanji Yarns Pvt Ltd Village Lakhowal…ITA/261/202616 Sept 2026
- Dm College of Education vs Income Tax Officer and OthersCWP/12371/20249 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026