THE BALLANA PRIMARY AGRI CO OP SOCIETY LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal, considered the oral request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court, in its order, granted the liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Ballana Primary Agri Co-operative Society Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Ambala, and others. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court considered the request for withdrawal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (Question of procedure and liberty to file fresh action). Assessee's Contention: The petitioner, through its counsel, sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Revenue's Contention: The judgment records no specific contention from the revenue regarding the withdrawal request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215
CWP-19413-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.08.2026 The Ballana Primary Agri Co-operative Society Limited ..... Petitioner
Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Ambala and others
..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Senior Standing counsel, Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE 20.08.2026 Satyawan Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SATYAWAN 2026.08.24 18:36 I agree to specified portions of this document
More judgments on Section 147A
- M/s. Sree Gopal Agencies vs National Faceless Assessment CentreWP/1196/202611 Oct 2026
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Avadhesh Pareek, AjmerITA 1904/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- S S Services Providers Through Its Partner… vs Deputy Commissioner/ Asst Commissioner of…CWP/22709/202522 Sept 2026
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1… vs Sharmanji Yarns Pvt Ltd Village Lakhowal…ITA/261/202616 Sept 2026
- Dm College of Education vs Income Tax Officer and OthersCWP/12371/20249 Sept 2026
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Sujit Paswan @ Sujit Pasman vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026