AMBA AIRLINKS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, in its detailed judgment of even date passed in CWP No. 15791 of 2024 (Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and others), provided the order for the present case, CWP-14933-2025. As the present judgment is a reference to another detailed judgment, the specific findings, reasoning, and ratio decidendi are not elaborated here. The operative directions would therefore be those contained within the referenced judgment. Any issue expressly left undecided would also be as per the referenced judgment. The High Court also disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications in this matter.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Amba Airlinks Private Limited, filed a writ petition (CWP-14933-2025) before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The petition was filed against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh, and others. The judgment indicates that the present case was to be decided based on the detailed judgment passed in a connected matter, CWP No. 15791 of 2024, titled Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and others. All pending miscellaneous applications related to this petition were also disposed of.
What were the issues?
The judgment does not explicitly state the specific issues or questions of law that the High Court had to decide in CWP-14933-2025. It is stated that the order for this petition is contained in the detailed judgment of an even date passed in CWP No. 15791 of 2024. Therefore, the issues to be decided are those addressed in the aforementioned connected writ petition. The judgment does not record any arguments presented by either the petitioner or the revenue in this specific writ petition, as it relies on the decision of a companion case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-14933-2025 (O&M) Reserved on : 08.09.2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026
AMBA AIRLINKS PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present : Mr. Kartik Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Standing Counsel
Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Junior Standing Counsel,
for the respondent(s)-revenue.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. 1.
For order see the detailed judgment of even date passed in CWP No.15791 of 2024 - Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and others. 2.
All pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE
10.09.2026
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.09.16 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026