SACHIN KUMAR CHAUHAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3) FARIDABAD AND OTHERS

PDF · subscribers
CWP/10333/2026HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01054990202609 April 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. Furthermore, the petitioner was granted liberty to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the fresh petition. The court did not decide on the merits of the case. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar Chauhan, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad, and others. The case came up for hearing on 09.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The withdrawal was sought with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Revenue's Contention: No specific contention is recorded for the respondents (revenue) in the judgment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.200-U CWP-10333-2026 Date of decision: 09.04.2026 Sachin Kumar Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: Mr. Kartik Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondents. * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE April 09, 2026 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2026.04.10 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

More judgments on Section 147A

All 31 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →