MICHEALLE FATIMA NIAZ, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) -3,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue any other remedies available to her under the law. No decision was made on the merits of any underlying tax dispute. The principle established is that a petitioner can withdraw their case, subject to court permission, and retain the right to seek alternative legal recourse.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Michealle Fatima Niaz, wife of the late Muhammed Niaz, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The respondents included the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 3. The specific assessment year(s) and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the writ petition and its final hearing. The amount in dispute is not mentioned.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal did not have to decide any issues as the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The only question before the Court was whether to grant permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The revenue's contentions are not recorded as the matter was disposed of on the petitioner's request.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 3RD ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 22682 OF 2023 PETITIONER: MICHEALLE FATIMA NIAZ, AGED 40 YEARS W./O. LATE. MUHAMMED NIAZ, RESIDING AT ZEREENE, ABAD RESIDENCY, CHERANELLUR ROAD, EDAPALLY, KOCHI, PIN – 682 024. BY ADVS. K.J.ABRAHAM PREMJIT NAGENDRAN NIKHIL JOHN RESPONDENTS: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) -3, POORNIMA BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, PANAMPALLY NAGAR, KOCHI, PIN – 682 036. BY ADV JOSE JOSEPH SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No. 22682/2023 : 2 : DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J. --------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 22682 of 2023
--------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2023.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to any remedy that may be available to her under law. sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDGE.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026