COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR vs. JODHPUR JILA MAHESHWARI SAMAJ
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the Revenue. The court noted that the issue involved in the present appeal was identical to the issue decided in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 170/18, "CIT (Exemption) Jaipur vs. Anaesthesia Society", decided on December 4, 2018. In that earlier case, the High Court had relied on the Supreme Court's decision in 'Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT' and its own previous decision in 'CIT vs. Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society' to dismiss the Revenue's appeal. Therefore, for parity of reasons, the present appeal filed by the Revenue was also dismissed. The operative direction was the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur, has appealed against an order dated March 6, 2018, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench. The ITAT had allowed an appeal filed by the respondent assessee, Jodhpur Jila Maheshwari Samaj, against an order dated February 29, 2016. In that earlier order, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) had rejected the assessee's application for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court was considering the appeal preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Act.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should entertain an appeal against the ITAT's order allowing registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the issue is covered by previous decisions of the High Court and the Supreme Court. Contentions: Assessee: No specific arguments recorded for the assessee in this judgment. Revenue: The learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by this court's decision in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 170/18, "CIT (Exemption) Jaipur vs. Anaesthesia Society", decided on December 4, 2018. This decision relied on the Apex Court's ruling in 'Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT' and a Bench decision of this court in 'CIT vs. Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society'. The Revenue argued that the appeal in the 'Anaesthesia Society' case, which involved an identical question and was preferred by the Revenue against an ITAT order, was dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 162/2018 Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption, Jaipur, Jaipur ----Appellant Versus Jodhpur Jila Maheshwari Samaj, C/o U.c. Jain And Associates, Shatrunjay Hari Singh Nagar, Pali Road, Jodhpur ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K.Bissa For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment 05/12/2018 1. This appeal preferred under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) is directed against order dated 6.3.18 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur, passed in ITA No.169/Jodh./2016, whereby an appeal preferred by the respondent assessee against the order dated 29.2.16 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) (Exemption), rejecting the application of the assessee under Section 12A of the Act, has been allowed and accordingly, CIT (Exemption) has been directed to grant registration to the assessee under Section 12A of the Act. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the issue involved in the present appeal stands covered by decision of this court in D.B.Income Tax Appeal No.170/18 “CIT (Exemption) Jaipur vs. Anaesthesia Society”,
(2 of 2) [ITA-162/2018] decided on 4.12.18, whereby relying upon the decision of the Apex Court in ‘Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT’, (1971) 82 ITR 704 and a Bench decision of this court in ‘CIT vs. Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society’, 258 ITR 548 (Raj.), the appeal involving identical question preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by the ITAT, has been dismissed. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is also dismissed for the parity of the reasons recorded in the decision of this court in Anaesthesia Society’s case (supra). (DINESH MEHTA),J (SANGEET LODHA),J 23-Aditya/-
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026