C.I.T.UDIPUR vs. SHRI RAJ.SYNTEX LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA/15/2008HC RajasthanRJHC01033278200721 February 2008Bench: DEO NARAYAN THANVI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer could not exercise powers under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the manner exercised in this case. The reasoning was that the original assessment order, made under Section 143 read with Section 148, had not been challenged by the revenue through appropriate legal remedies. Consequently, the Tribunal was not in error in passing its impugned order. Therefore, no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed. No issue was expressly left undecided.

What were the facts?

This case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), Udaipur, against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated. The core issue revolves around an order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO's action was taken subsequent to an assessment made under Section 143 read with Section 148. The revenue has not challenged the original assessment order through available legal remedies. The High Court is considering whether the ITAT erred in its decision.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Assessing Officer could validly exercise powers under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the original assessment order, passed under Section 143 read with Section 148, was not challenged by the revenue through appropriate legal remedies? Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee, Shri Raj. Syntex Ltd. Revenue's Contention: The revenue, represented by the CIT, argued that the Assessing Officer was justified in exercising powers under Section 154. The revenue's argument implicitly suggests that the ITAT erred in holding otherwise. The judgment does not name any specific authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by the revenue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143,Section 148,Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 15 of 2008 C.I.T.UDIPUR V/S SHRI RAJ.SYNTEX LTD. Mr. KK BISSA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 21.2.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the revenue. In our view, when the assessment was made under Section 143 read with Section 148, and admittedly when that assessment order has not been challenged by the revenue by availing appropriately available legal remedy, it cannot be said that the Assessing Officer could exercise powers under Section 154, for the purposes, and in the manner, exercised in this particular case. The learned Tribunal, therefore, cannot be said to be in error in passing the impugned order, and no substantial question of law, therefore, arises in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

( DEO NARAYAN THANVI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →