JETHMAL F.SONI vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and ANR
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. No decision was made on the merits of the case, as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court's reasoning was based solely on accommodating the petitioner's procedural request to pursue a different legal remedy.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Jethmal F. Soni, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order or action by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Inv. Circle 1(1), Pune, and another respondent. The assessment year(s) are not specified in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is not detailed. The matter came before the High Court on December 2, 2004.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal (in this case, the High Court) did not have to decide any substantive issues of law or fact. The sole question before the court was whether to grant the petitioner's request. The petitioner's counsel prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The revenue's contentions are not recorded as the matter was disposed of on the petitioner's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2788 OF 2004 Jethmal F. Soni .. Petitioner. V/s. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Inv.Circle 1(1), Pune & Another .. Respondents. Mr.Jaydeep Deo i/b. Suhasini Mutalik for the petitioner. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 2ND DECEMBER, 2004. DATED : 2ND DECEMBER, 2004. DATED : 2ND DECEMBER, 2004. P.C. : Mr.Jaydeep Deo, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026