THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 MUMBAI vs. THE MARATHA MANDIR CO-OP BANK LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITXA/4125/2010HC Bombay21 July 2011Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.A. SAYED4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the ITAT's decision was justified. The Court distinguished the Apex Court's ruling in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. on three grounds. Firstly, the Apex Court itself distinguished cases of co-operative banks from co-operative sale societies. Secondly, the interest income in this case was closely connected to the banking business as it arose from an advance rent payment to a landlord from whom premises were taken for banking operations. Thirdly, the Reserve Bank of India's guidelines permit such advances by co-operative banks, making the interest earned in accordance with prescribed norms and thus part of the banking business. Therefore, the interest income was eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s. The Maratha Mandir Co-op. Bank Ltd., a co-operative bank, paid advance rent for premises used for its banking business. The landlord requested this advance, and the bank charged interest on it. The assessee claimed this interest income as eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer rejected this claim, stating the interest was not from banking business. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the CIT(A)'s order. The revenue has appealed this decision to the High Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances and in law, the Tribunal was justified in directing the assessing officer to include the interest on the amount of advance rent receipt amounting to Rs. 18,88,541/- for the purpose of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T. Act? Assessee's contentions: The interest income arose on account of giving advance rent to the landlord from whom premises were taken for banking business, making it closely connected to the banking business. The Reserve Bank of India's guidelines (18/6/1987) permit co-operative banks to give advance rent subject to charging interest, thus earning interest in accordance with RBI norms and carrying on banking business. The Apex Court's decision in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. is distinguishable. Revenue's contentions: Relied on the Apex Court's decision in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v/s. ITO reported in [2010] 322 ITR 283 (SC) to argue that the ITAT's decision cannot be sustained.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 itxa4125-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4125 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-1 ] 3rd Floor, Room No.387, Aayakar ] Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai. ] ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. The Maratha Mandir Co-op. Bank Ltd., ] Madhushree Plot No.85, District Business ] Centre, Sector 17, Navi Mumbai-400 073. ] ..Respondent. Ms. Anamika Malhotra for appellant. Mr. S.N.Inamdar, senior Advocate with Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.

DATED : 21ST JULY, 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

1.

The question of law raised by the revenue in this appeal reads thus:- " Whether on the facts and circumstances and in law the Tribunal CNR No : HCBM020064822010 Uploaded on - 21/08/2020 Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 05:00:49

2 itxa4125-10 was justified in directing the assessing officer to include the interest on the amount of advance rent receipt amounting to Rs. 18,88,541/- for the purpose of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T. Act ? " 2. The assessment year involved herein is AY 2005-06. 3. The respondent-assessee is a Co-perative Bank. The assessee had taken certain premises from the landlord for carrying on its banking business. At the request of the landlord, the assessee paid advance rent subject to payment of interest. The interest income so received was claimed as income from banking business eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. 4. The assessing officer rejected the claim of the assessee on the ground that the interest income received from advance rent cannot be said to be from the banking business as contemplated under Sect6ion 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 5. On appeal filed by the assessee, the CIT(A) held that the interest income was received in the course of banking business and hence eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. ITAT has upheld the order of CIT(A). Hence, this appeal is filed by the revenue. Uploaded on - 21/08/2020 Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 05:00:49

3 itxa4125-10 6. Counsel for the revenue submitted that in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. V/s. ITO reported in [2010] 322 ITR 283 (SC), the decision of the ITAT cannot be sustained. 7. As rightly contended by the senior Counsel for the assessee the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. (supra) is distinguishable on facts, because, firstly the Apex Court itself (see para 11 of the judgment) has distinguished cases relating to co-operative banks from the cases relating to the Co- operative Sale Society. Secondly, the interest income in the present case arose on account of giving advance rent to the landlord from whom premises were taken on rent for the purpose of carrying on banking business. Thus, the interest income in the present case is closely connected to the banking business carried on by the assessee. Thirdly, the Reserve Bank of India, controlling the banking business in India has issued guidelines on 18/6/1987 thereby permitting the co-operative banks to give advance rent to the landlords (from whom premises are taken for carrying on the business) subject to charging interest and other conditions set out therein. Thus. the interest income on advance rent is earned in accordance with the norms laid down by RBI and hence it would be income earned during the course of carrying on the business of banking. Uploaded on - 21/08/2020 Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 05:00:49

4 itxa4125-10 8. In these circumstances, the decision of the ITAT in holding that the interest on advance rent is business income eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act cannot be faulted. As the interest income earned by the assessee is directly linked to the banking business carried on by the assessee, the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Totgar's Cooperative Sale Society Limited (supra) would have no application to the facts of the present case. 9. In the result, we see no merit in this appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Uploaded on - 21/08/2020 Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 05:00:49 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

All 2,347 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(a)(i) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →