TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petitions. The Court's decision was to dismiss the petitions with the liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge subsequent actions before the appropriate forum. The reasoning for this decision is based on the petitioner's submission regarding subsequent developments and the desire to pursue remedies elsewhere. The operative direction is the dismissal of the petitions with the specified liberty. No specific findings on the merits of any tax dispute were made as the petitions were withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Tirupati Construction Company, through its partner Suresh Kumar Dhakad, filed two writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The petitions challenged actions or orders passed by the Income Tax Office and the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. The specific assessment years and the exact nature of the orders under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that these writ petitions were filed and subsequently came up for hearing before the Court.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner can withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to challenge subsequent actions before the proper forum? (Question of procedure/law) Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of subsequent developments, they may be permitted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to challenge the subsequent actions before the proper forum. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contention from the respondents (Income Tax Office and Additional Commissioner of Income Tax).
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 19/10/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Gargieya, submits that in view of subsequent developments, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to challenge the subsequent actions before the proper forum.
In view of above, the petitions are dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. (SANDEEP MEHTA),J (PANKAJ MITHAL),CJ 77-a.asopa/- Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) (Uploaded on 20/10/2022 at 01:20:12 PM) (Downloaded on 28/10/2026 at 12:05:10 AM)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026