SURYA CONSTRUCTIONS P.LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 9 (4)

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1119 / 2006HC Delhi15 January 20071 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The judgment records that the High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal and framed three substantial questions of law. It does not provide the Tribunal's decision or reasoning on these questions, nor does it state what the Tribunal held. The operative directions issued by the High Court were to admit the appeal and frame the questions of law, and to file the paper book. No specific finding on the merits of the case or any relief granted or denied by the Tribunal is mentioned in this extract. The judgment is silent on whether any issue was expressly left undecided.

What were the facts?

This case involves an appeal by Surya Constructions P.L.td. (the assessee) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The respondent is the Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(4) (the revenue). The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated. The appeal challenges the Tribunal's decision to examine the merits of the case without a specific ground raised by the revenue against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s conclusion regarding action taken under Section 148. The procedural history indicates that the High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law for consideration. The court also directed the filing of a paper book.

What were the issues?

The High Court framed three substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal could examine the merits of the case without the Revenue raising a specific ground challenging the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s conclusion on action taken under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. Whether a reference made under Section 55A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the valuation cell and the resulting valuation report could be legally deemed to have been obtained under Section 142A of the Act? 3. Whether the valuation report of the District Valuation Officer, dated 17th February, 1998, which determined the year-wise cost of construction, constitutes a reason to believe for reopening the assessment when the assessee's books of accounts recording the cost of construction were not rejected? The judgment does not record the arguments made by the assessee or the revenue on these questions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 55A,Section 142A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 1119/2006 . SURYA CONSTRUCTIONS P.LTD. ..... Appellant Through versus . INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 9 (4) ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA .

O R D E R 15.01.2007 Admit.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the following substantial questions of law are framed for our consideration:- ?1.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal could have examined the merits of the case in the absence of any specific ground having been raised by the Revenue challenging the conclusion of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in respect of action taken under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? ITA 1119/2006 2. Whether the reference made under Section 55A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the valuation cell and the valuation report obtained pursuant thereto could in law be deemed to be obtained under Section 142A of the Act? . 3.Whether the valuation report of the District Valuation Officer dated 17th February, 1998 determining the year-wise cost of construction constitutes reason to believe for reopening the assessment when the books of accounts of the assessee recording the cost of construction was not rejected?? . .

Paper book be filed in accordance with the High Court Rules. . . . MADAN B. LOKUR, J . . V. B. GUPTA, J JANUARY 15, 2007 sb . . ITA 1119/2006

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →