MIXPANEL, INC. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2-2-1, INTERNATIONAL TAX, NEW DELHI & ANR.
What did the High Court hold?
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petitions. The Court directed the Assessing Officer to pay the requisite amount along with applicable interest under Section 244A and Section 244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in accordance with the law. This payment was to be made on or before November 30, 2026. The Court noted that the Assessing Officer had passed orders and determined the refund and interest, and the revenue assured payment within four weeks. The Court's direction was to ensure this payment was completed by the specified date. The interlocutory applications were also disposed of along with the writ petitions.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Mixpanel, Inc., filed three writ petitions (W.P.(C) 7165/2026, 7166/2026, and 7168/2026) before the Delhi High Court. During the pendency of these petitions, the Assessing Officer (AO) passed orders and determined the refund and applicable interest for the petitioner. The Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents assured the Court that the requisite amount would be paid or credited to the petitioner's account within four weeks. The Court was informed of these developments by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Assessing Officer has passed the necessary orders determining the refund and applicable interest for the petitioner, Mixpanel, Inc. (Question of fact). Assessee's Contention: The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the Assessing Officer had indeed passed orders and determined the refund and applicable interest during the pendency of the writ petitions. Revenue's Contention: The Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents assured the Court that the requisite amount would be paid/credited in the petitioner's account within four weeks, implying that the process of determination and payment was being addressed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
$~4, 5 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010232092026 + W.P.(C) 7165/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010232102026 + W.P.(C) 7166/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010232122026 + W.P.(C) 7168/2026
MIXPANEL, INC.
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney & Mr. Nishank Vashistha, Advs.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2-2-1, INTERNATIONAL TAX, NEW DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh, JSC, Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSC & Mr. Shamindra Kumar Dev, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE ADITI CHOUDHARY
O R D E R %
07.10.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner informed that during the pendency of the present writ petitions, the Assessing Officer (AO) has passed orders and determined the refund and applicable interest. 2. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents assures that the requisite amount shall be paid/credited in the petitioner’s account within four weeks. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:27:28
We, therefore, dispose of the writ petitions while directing the AO to pay the requisite amount alongwith applicable interest under Section 244A and Section 244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in accordance with law, on or before 30.11.2026. 4. Writ petitions stand disposed of alongwith interlocutory applications.
DINESH MEHTA, J.
ADITI CHOUDHARY, J. OCTOBER 7, 2026/sid
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:27:28
More judgments on Section 244A
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(3), RajkotITA 366/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(5), RajkotITA 257/RJT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Pratibha Sanjai Srivastava, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 2565/AHD/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026