THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 vs. SHRI G. NAND GOPAL
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Delhi held that the appeal was not maintainable in light of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015. The circular, dated December 10, 2015, sets a minimum monetary limit of Rs. 20,00,000/- for filing appeals by the Revenue before the High Courts. Paragraph 10 of the circular clarifies that this instruction applies retrospectively to pending appeals, and such appeals below the specified tax limits may be withdrawn or not pressed. Since the tax effect in the present appeal was Rs. 15,65,488/-, which is below the Rs. 20,00,000/- threshold, the Court directed that the appeal be dismissed as not pressed. The ratio decidendi is that the Revenue is bound by its own monetary limits for filing appeals, and pending appeals that fall below these limits should be disposed of accordingly.
What were the facts?
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax-21) against an order concerning Shri G. Nand Gopal. The tax effect in the present appeal is stated to be Rs. 15,65,488/-. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Delhi. The procedural history relevant to the disposal of this appeal is the issuance of Circular No. 21/2015 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on December 10, 2015, which revised the minimum monetary limit for filing appeals by the Revenue before the High Courts to Rs. 20,00,000/- and above. This circular was made applicable retrospectively to pending appeals.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable before the High Court, given the tax effect and the CBDT Circular No. 21/2015? (Question of law) The Revenue argued that the appeal was filed before the issuance of the circular and therefore should be considered. However, the circular explicitly states that pending appeals below the specified tax limits may be withdrawn or not pressed. The Respondent (assessee) did not file any arguments as recorded in the judgment. The core issue revolves around the applicability of the CBDT circular to the pending appeal and whether the Revenue should be permitted to pursue an appeal with a tax effect below the revised threshold.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 28. + ITA 959/2015 TKDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 Appellant Through: Mr Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel. versus SHRI G. NAND GOPAL Respondent Through CORAM; JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER % 15.12.2015 1. The tax effect in the prayer of the present appeal is Rs. 15,65,488/-. In terms of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10^'' December, 2015 issued by Central Board Direct Taxes, the minimum monetary limit for filing of appeals by the Revenue before this Court is set at Rs.20,00,000/- and above. 2. Para 10 of the circular makes it clear that the instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the High Courts/Tribunals. It further states that pending appeals below the specified tax limits may be withdrawn/ not pressed. ITA 959/2015 Page I of2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. DECEMBER 15, 2015 MK S.MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 959/2015 Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
