THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3 vs. EVALUESERVE.COM PVT. LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA/921/2017HC DelhiDLHC01288629201731 October 2017Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA1 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 921/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia with Mr. Gaurav Khetrapal, Advocates. versus EVALUESERVE.COM PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 31.10.2017 ITA 921/2017 & CM No.39113/2017 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) The only ground on which the Revenue claims to be aggrieved is the exclusion of Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd. which provides engineering design, detailing services, website design services etc. The assessee provides back-office research services in the IT Sector. Being a pure question of fact, the findings of the ITAT, in the opinion of this Court, cannot be looked into or faulted under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 31, 2017/st

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →