THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 vs. MSD PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD.
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 837/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. versus MSD PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra and Mr.Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 16.09.2019 1. The question urged with regard to the power of the Tribunal to grant stay of demand for a period exceeding 365 days (as provided for in the second proviso to section 254 (2A) of the Income Tact Act, 1961), is covered by thedecision of this Court in Pepsi Foods Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2015) 367 ITR 87. 2. In the present case, it is not dispute that the respondent assessee is not responsible for the delay. Appellants have been heard by the tribunal. No question of law arises in the present case. The appeal is dismissed. VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2019/Pallavi
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026