COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. ESCORTS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIMITED

PDF · subscribers
ITA/837/2008HC DelhiDLHC01144729200725 February 2016Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU1 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

32 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +

ITA 837/2008

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Senior Standing

Counsel with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing

Counsel.

versus

ESCORTS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIMITED .... Respondent

Through: Mr. S. Mehta, Ms. Swati R.K. and

Mr. Z. Hanifi, Advocates.

CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R %

25.02.2016

1.

Learned counsel for the Revenue points out that the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. He states that in view of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, she does not press this appeal. 2. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

S. MURALIDHAR, J

VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 25, 2016 `ns’

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →