COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S INDIAN SUGAR & GENERAL IND

PDF · subscribers
ITA/821/2005HC DelhiDLHC01059831200507 September 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The primary reasoning for this dismissal was that the overall tax effect of the dispute was below the minimum threshold of ₹50 lakh, as stipulated by Notification/Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated July 11, 2018. The Court observed that the impugned order of the ITAT had concurred with a previous order on the matter. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable on account of the low tax effect. No specific finding was made on the merits of the interest payment under Section 244-A, as the appeal was disposed of on a procedural ground related to the monetary limit.

What were the facts?

The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax, appealed against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeal concerned the payment of interest under Section 244-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to excess Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounts that were recovered. The High Court noted that the overall tax effect of the dispute was less than the minimum threshold of ₹50 lakh stipulated for Revenue appeals by Notification/Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated July 11, 2018. The impugned order of the ITAT had concurred with a prior order on the issue.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the High Court should entertain an appeal by the Revenue when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit for appeals, as per Notification/Circular No. 3 of 2018. Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee. However, the High Court's decision to dismiss the appeal implicitly acknowledges the assessee's position or the lack of merit in the Revenue's appeal based on the tax effect. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue, through its counsel, presented the appeal before the High Court, seeking to challenge the ITAT's order concerning the payment of interest under Section 244-A on excess TDS amounts. The judgment does not detail specific arguments made by the Revenue beyond the fact of filing the appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 244-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 821/2005

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue.

versus

M/S INDIAN SUGAR & GENERAL IND ..... Respondent

Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R %

07.09.2018

The question of law framed pertained to the payment of interest under Section 244-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of the excess TDS amounts recovered. The impugned order has concurred with the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Furthermore, this Court notices from the record that the overall tax effect is less than the minimum stipulated for a Revenue appeal (`50 lac) by Notification/Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018.

The appeal is consequently dismissed.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

A. K. CHAWLA, J SEPTEMBER 07, 2018 nn

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →