DELHI MILK SCHEME, NEW DELHI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & A
What did the High Court hold?
The judgment states, 'For orders, see ITA No. 1466/2006.' This indicates that the decision in ITA No. 636 of 2007 is dependent on or is being delivered in conjunction with another appeal, ITA No. 1466/2006. The specific findings, reasoning, ratio decidendi, or operative directions for ITA No. 636 of 2007 are not provided in this excerpt. No issue was expressly left undecided as no issues were identified.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Delhi Milk Scheme, filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-II and the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 4(1), Delhi. The specific assessment year(s) and the nature of the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history leading to this appeal is also not elaborated. The amount in dispute, if any, is not mentioned. The judgment was reserved on February 21, 2008, and delivered on March 04, 2008.
What were the issues?
The provided text does not contain any information regarding the specific issues the Tribunal had to decide, nor does it record the arguments presented by the assessee (Delhi Milk Scheme) or the revenue (Commissioner of Income-tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax). Therefore, no questions of law or fact, nor any contentions or reliance on authorities, can be identified from this judgment snippet.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 636/2007
Page 1 of 2 * HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI
+ ITA No. 636 of 2007
Judgment reserved on: February 21, 2008
Judgment delivered on: March 04, 2008
Delhi Milk Scheme New Delhi
…Appellant
Through Mr. P.N. Monga with Mr. Manu
Monga, Advocates
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-II
C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle 4(1), C.R. Building, I.P. Estate
New Delhi
…Respondents
Through Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate
Coram:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA
Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Yes
To be referred to Reporter or not? Not necessary
Whether the judgment should be reported Not necessary in the Digest?
ITA 636/2007
Page 2 of 2 MADAN B. LOKUR, J.
For orders, see ITA No. 1466/2006.
MADAN B. LOKUR, J
March 04, 2008
V.B. GUPTA, J ncg
Certified that the corrected copy of the judgment has been transmitted in the main Server.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026